It is currently 02 Mar 2025 22:29

All times are UTC




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Building for torque
PostPosted: 22 Mar 2010 22:07 
I didn't want to spam up Albert's exhaust thread in the technical forum, so I thought that I'd start one off here.

I want to tune my CR for torque rather than outright horsepower - I don't ever envisage riding this bike at 140 mph ( even if I could hold on ) so I am quite prepared to sacrifice some top end for more low down grunt - but how do I go about this - most of the aftermarket exhaust offerings seem to want to chase top end horsepower so how can I get a pipe/tune combination to achieve torque ?

Discuss ...


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Building for torque
PostPosted: 22 Mar 2010 22:30 
Offline

Joined: 11 May 2009 22:36
Posts: 252
Despite popular belief, bike manufacturers spend so much effort on exhaust-design these days that only few after-market exhausts achieve the torque / power curves of the originals, let alone exceed them. Even some of the sports-exhausts that generously breach legal emission and soundlevels aren't always delivering the promised goods.

For getting more torque at lower revs you usually need a longer stroke, smaller valves and / or gentler valve lift- and timing. Chosing a 145 bhp sports-twin is not necessarily the best starting point for all that lOl


Top
 Post subject: Re: Building for torque
PostPosted: 22 Mar 2010 22:43 
But a mass produced bike is surely built as a compromise between horsepower/torque - I can easily chase horsepower, I have an R for that and there is plenty of info out there for doing that - but there doesn't seem to be an awful lot of info on getting more torque - as you stated there is more than enough horsepower on tap so it wouldn't hurt to sacrifice a little.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Building for torque
PostPosted: 22 Mar 2010 23:26 
Rather than pursuing engine tuning, why not try altering final drive gearing? :?:
Bespoke pulleys and belt ( the pulleys could be machined to accept a more common belt tooth pitch) and maybe a tensioner would give drastic changes to at the wheel torque , you could build a proper wheelie machine that still has 120 mph potential! Would be cheaper/safer than developing a motor too.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Building for torque
PostPosted: 23 Mar 2010 10:37 
If you alter the pulleys then the speedo will be wrong - another thing to bear in mind.
The CR already has different gearing to the R - it is geared lower for better acceleration. I want more torque for 2 up riding, other manufacturers will retune an engine to produce different models for different uses - touring, off-road, etc so it must be possible - just not sure how to go about it.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Building for torque
PostPosted: 23 Mar 2010 10:58 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 06 May 2009 18:18
Posts: 1512
Current ride: CB1300, Z750, R1200
Location: Esslingen/Neckar, Germany
sportster_mann wrote:
If you alter the pulleys then the speedo will be wrong

No real challenge, speedo output is adjustable through eeprom parameter.

_________________
"It is often said that before you die your life passes before your eyes. It is in fact true. It's called living."
Terry Pratchett


Top
 Post subject: Re: Building for torque
PostPosted: 23 Mar 2010 17:20 
Offline
I'd rather race a Honda 90

Joined: 08 May 2009 08:31
Posts: 3137
Location: Rhodesia.
Or.... http://www.about-bicycles.com/bicycle-speedometers.htm

_________________
Spencer Racing... www.spencerracing.co.uk


Top
 Post subject: Re: Building for torque
PostPosted: 23 Mar 2010 21:14 
Offline
Resident Bender
User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2009 19:28
Posts: 1601
Current ride: EBR 1190RX
Location: banbury uk
longer primaries will give more torque lower down the rev range,
isn't it grunty enough?
i have no complaints about mine apart from its very lumpy when pottering through 30 limits :)

_________________
Buell X1
Buell xb12s
Buell 1125r
Ebr 1190rx
Bimota Db7
Norton v4rr??



http://www.aph-performance-engineering.com


Top
 Post subject: Re: Building for torque
PostPosted: 23 Mar 2010 21:55 
albert666 wrote:
i have no complaints about mine apart from its very lumpy when pottering through 30 limits :)


Mine is the same and I got caught in the rain the other day coming back home from work when it cut in the morning and it was hell-ish


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Building for torque
PostPosted: 23 Mar 2010 21:59 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2009 17:17
Posts: 8643
Location: Manchester
Should've got the lower geared CR....or better yet, a real Buell :twisted:

....if Mcr. wont or dont know how to de-noid, fetch it round and I'll sort it for ya ;)

_________________
Mithered ta death.
92 MB
96 S2T
98 S1W
00 M2
01 X1
03 P3
10 CR


Top
 Post subject: Re: Building for torque
PostPosted: 23 Mar 2010 22:08 
:maz: Iam round on sat i think if Rab ever gets back to me - the denoid etc will have to wait as I have just paid for a holiday and getting a house sorted at the mo


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Building for torque
PostPosted: 23 Mar 2010 22:23 
The resistor for the denoid costs about £6 and if you can remove the seat yourself then you can do it ... :o

You don't have to remove the solenoid - just unplug it from the wiring loom and plug the resistor in its place.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Building for torque
PostPosted: 23 Mar 2010 22:25 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2009 17:17
Posts: 8643
Location: Manchester
......and obviously......I keep the resistors in stock ;)

_________________
Mithered ta death.
92 MB
96 S2T
98 S1W
00 M2
01 X1
03 P3
10 CR


Top
 Post subject: Re: Building for torque
PostPosted: 24 Mar 2010 02:51 
Offline
has it got a pulse?
User avatar

Joined: 06 May 2009 15:47
Posts: 2565
Current ride: FUBAR...Enough said!
Location: Reading
Maz wrote:
......and obviously......I keep the resistors in stock ;)


oooooooooooooooh ark at you :!:














Sorry..........couldn't resistor it :!: lOl lOl

_________________
FUBAR pilot

You only need two bikes in life-an S1 and a Multistrada!


Top
 Post subject: Re: Building for torque
PostPosted: 24 Mar 2010 21:06 
Offline

Joined: 06 Feb 2010 11:19
Posts: 13
Location: Preston
If this was a car you were talking about then longer intake path would give better 'ram charging' at lower RPM. Is this a possibility on this bike?

Another possibility would be lower Compression Ratio.

Or change the cam timing slightly - I think retarding the exhaust would do it??


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited